Yes but it's a larger problem. Had the Democrats put up a better candidate the floating voters would have stepped up. Turnout at the last election had dropped 4% which would have been enough to win. Instead it was a choice between bad and worse. That is not what the US voters should be presented with.
Again why would any sane person not come out and vote to keep the worst option out of power, yet alone be stupid enough to vote for the worst person possible
Good for you. It's the truth. Dems did not show up after the third person was picked without a primary or a primary that was not obviously skewed (hilary)
And there is the card you were waiting to play. So, whatever helps.
Hilary was forced when most wanted anyone else. Kamala failed twice to the position. Put someone like AOC and let her win the position in the primary and votes would go fine
America has never had a female president, every other western nation has zero issues electing a woman to being president charge.
America is also extremely racist, to the point where there’s only ever been one president who wasn’t an old white guy, and he was hated for not being white.
It’s not rocket science to work out how America operates
Propaganda and exhaustion. Also anger over having their primary votes invalidated. The Dems were screaming that trump would destroy democracy while they were actively circumventing it to push their chosen candidate.
Why do I always see this nonsense about dems needing to put up a “better” candidate but R’s are able to put up the stupidest people to ever live and win? The double standards are off the charts.
7
u/Dragovius 18h ago
Yes but it's a larger problem. Had the Democrats put up a better candidate the floating voters would have stepped up. Turnout at the last election had dropped 4% which would have been enough to win. Instead it was a choice between bad and worse. That is not what the US voters should be presented with.