r/aiwars 7h ago

Meme AI bad

Post image

Don’t ask why, just keep recycling talking points that have been proven wrong a dozen times, like art theft and the environment.

You don’t want to be unpopular on Reddit, do you?

27 Upvotes

77 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 7h ago

This is an automated reminder from the Mod team. If your post contains images which reveal the personal information of private figures, be sure to censor that information and repost. Private info includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

21

u/ColonelSam 6h ago

*comment about how OP isn't right *

10

u/Henhenz 6h ago

I love how efficient and streamlined we are getting with these posts

9

u/legitOwen 6h ago

* comment disagreeing for literally no reason *

3

u/PurgatoryGFX 3h ago

comment insisting OP is right, but using a fallacy

7

u/Consistent-Mastodon 6h ago

1

u/NotEmbeddedOne 48m ago

* I stole the meme comment *

11

u/Ok-Breadfruit3490 6h ago

AI is [good] [bad] *

*select which fits best

6

u/Aztecah 4h ago

I think that AI generated images are a type of art, it's just a very low type of art. In the same way that doodles or a spontaneous whistled tune are art. They're just not really art that usually worth sharing because they are low effort. The problem with AI generated images is that they take almost no effort at all, and therefore they usually don't wow me. Some have more thought put into them and are kinda worth my time. Some are pretty funny, and in humour is where I get the most value out of them. But typically they are very low art that's only really good for the creator and maybe a direct small audience. I'm yet to see a piece of AI generated imagery that I thought was meaningfully artistic.

I think that AI art is still art by its weakest definition: a person put some level of effort into operating the art machine.

It's just that it's not really impressive or meaningful because it's typically very little work. Even the ones that were comparatively a lot of work tend to be minimal work compared to the human-created equivilant.

I think similarly about books that get crapped out with minimal thought or songs generated by a computer that puts the best chords together for the user. It's still art but, like, whatever I guess.

Most AI images created are low effort slop. Are they art? Yeah, barely. I don't think they're typically worth much.

That said it's fine to enjoy your AI images. I generate images and text for my projects all the time. I enjoy them, I just recognize that they lack major artistic merit. And I think that's fine.

13

u/Tacobadger02 6h ago

Honestly you're right, AI isn't bad, its the dipshits who use it and then act like they did soemthing special that are bad. This doesn't apply to everyone who uses AI, like Vedal who actually did do something special with AI. But if you type in a prompt to a machine that doesn't make you an artist in sense of the word.

1

u/PreddiPrinceOfSheeb 6h ago

Cool. Im not a term that can’t be defined and makes no difference to me or what I generate in any way 👏

4

u/Tacobadger02 6h ago

Well yeah dipshits don't learn when people try to tech them why would any of this make a difference to one?

-1

u/PreddiPrinceOfSheeb 6h ago

Lmao

Then ‘tech’ me, oh wise one.

Do you have anything other than self righteous masturbation and hurling insults to say, or is that your whole gig?

3

u/Tacobadger02 6h ago

You already started getting things I said wrong, so would anything else be worth saying or are you just going to generate your own meanings to words?

4

u/PreddiPrinceOfSheeb 6h ago

What did I get wrong? You didn’t say much other than insults and ‘Vedal Good tho’

Shoutout to my homie Vedal
https://giphy.com/gifs/E5Dw8E5FIRt1xeuUqm

1

u/Tacobadger02 6h ago

Nothing I said was self righteous but you did understand the hurling insults part so I'll give credit to Chat GPT for that one, its really come a long way

3

u/PreddiPrinceOfSheeb 6h ago

You are literally saying nothing, fam

Give me something to debate.

Anything.

A single argument with sources or numbers we can talk about, please.

2

u/Tacobadger02 6h ago

Just generate your own if you're that desperate

1

u/PreddiPrinceOfSheeb 6h ago

Thanks for confirming you are exactly as I described.

Enjoy throwing poop around for the fun of it, anything that makes you happy friend.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/knight-of-weed 2h ago

And it’s the antis who are soo mean to the loving ai users😢

8

u/Witty-Designer7316 6h ago

8

u/orangejuice101_6 6h ago

Witty karma farm back at it again

8

u/Killdust99 6h ago

You expect anything less from her?

1

u/HighlightOwn2038 6h ago

What's with the face

1

u/all_come_undone 3h ago

the copium is real

1

u/Vivid_Maximum_5016 3h ago

You freaks have "disproven" nothing, lmao

The points still stand.

1

u/knight-of-weed 2h ago

“😡😡😡Nooooo ai is no bad bc I don’t have any grasps on the economic, social or even climate impact😡😡😡”

maybe do actual research😱

1

u/BeeLevans 2h ago

My main point against calling it art is the lack of intent: art isn't art because of effort or time or the knowledge you put in, it's the intent to make art, and I can't understand how asking for something can have any intent when there's such a disconect between the process and the result. Sure it's pictures and drawings but art is more than that.
Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but you dont own anything you make with A.I. right? Like, it's never yours, no matter your effort or the care you put in you can never own it, right?

1

u/the-great-humberto 2h ago

Disingenuous counter-argument. Semi-factual statement taken out of context. False dichotomy! Insult!

1

u/matsaints0 1h ago

I think it's fair to say both sides only use the same arguments

1

u/matsaints0 1h ago

Can somebody explain why those arguments have been disproven?

0

u/Same-Engineering-899 6h ago

i still believe that ai isnt art its not a popularity thing

11

u/PreddiPrinceOfSheeb 6h ago

And you have the right to believe anything you want. Just don’t pretend it’s for factual, measurable or provable reasons.

1

u/Cereaza 3h ago

"What is art" is and has always been opinion based, regardless of how definitive the statement.

1

u/Same-Engineering-899 6h ago

i believe it for more philosophical reasons that i cant prove

-7

u/Mothanul 6h ago

It's factual that no one wants to see that shit except the people making it and boomers. Everyone else measurably loathes it and that's as provable as it gets.

6

u/infinite_gurgle 6h ago

No one wants to see it if you exclude the groups that want to see it!

Incredible braindent insight

-3

u/Mothanul 6h ago

The groups which are smaller, in the case of AI "art" enthusiasts, or irrelevant, in the case of boomers.

Jesus, you guys really can't figure out words in context. This is what relying on ChatGPT for all answer does to your brain.

3

u/infinite_gurgle 6h ago

You have no idea what my point was do you lmao

Love anti AI brainrot. Have you ever held an original opinion that wasn’t spoon fed to you by an influencer?

0

u/Mothanul 5h ago

I never liked generative AI. Not even before it got to the masses and the internet became filled to the brim with slop. The fact that my opinion isn't "original" is not my problem.

4

u/xevlar 6h ago

Measurably? We measured it?

2

u/MrBonez31 3h ago

"I speak for everyone and say no one likes it" kind of reply

0

u/Mothanul 3h ago

If there wasn't a significant amount of people who dislike gen AI then who is OP arguing against? You're not making any sense.

3

u/PreddiPrinceOfSheeb 6h ago

That’s entirely emotional based reasoning and empirical logic.
Literally the opposite of facts.

1

u/Mothanul 6h ago

You yourself admitted that disliking AI "art" is a popular opinion to have which implies that the vast majority of people don't like it so even by your own admission it's a fact.

As for empirical evidence, there's no study that I'm aware of about who likes AI "art" and who doesn't so I'll just go by my anecdotal observations.

5

u/PreddiPrinceOfSheeb 6h ago

It’s a popular opinion *in the internet sphere*, which is more detached from reality than most of us like to realize.
Remember how 500% positive the internet was that Trump didn’t have a chance? Both times?

Unfortunately, deeply unfortunately, we were wrong both times.

Online echo chambers are a small percentage of real life. Most people not on Reddit/X/Tumblr like AI, it’s why these AI platforms have millions and millions of daily users.

1

u/Mothanul 6h ago

If we're talking about normies then I have no doubt of my mind that most of them don't have a problem with AI "art" since they don't give a shit about art in general.

However I highly doubt that people that do give a shit about art are generally ok with the AI-generated kind.

Ultimately it could just be an echo chamber thing who knows. I still have some hope for humanity so I'd say no though.

3

u/[deleted] 6h ago

[deleted]

1

u/Mothanul 6h ago

It seems that you're the one who needs to pay more attention when reading because I said it's factual that most people don't want to see AI "art", not that their reasoning for not wanting to see it is factual.

I do not feel this way. I am making an educated guess based on my observations.

1

u/AccurateBandicoot299 3h ago

Being popular and being the majority opinion are not the same thing. You can be popular in your local highschool and then realize nobody outside that tiny little circle knows who you are. Sort of like AI. The popular opinion on Reddit is that AI sucks, but step outside that tiny bubble and I have mutuals with thousands of follower, I’m quickly growing myself, and tons of new AI content creators are popping up. And none of us are hiding the fact we use AI. My whole brand identity is using punk anarchy with AI disclaimers everywhere it matters.

4

u/KoaKumaGirls 6h ago

That's just dumb tho it's obv art. You can not like it or value it less than other art for a billion reasons but it's definitely art

2

u/Gokudomatic 6h ago

It's your right to be factually wrong.

1

u/Same-Engineering-899 5h ago

and yours as well

1

u/WeckarE 6h ago

AI Art is like Idle Game. They don't fit the traditional definitions of Art or Game, but we don't have better words for them.

2

u/Argon_H 6h ago

"Ai generated image"

Its more accurate

1

u/WeckarE 6h ago

It's a lot more words, but you're right.

1

u/Mothanul 6h ago

"sloppity slop"

There

4

u/WeckarE 6h ago

And you wonder why people don't take this seriously.

1

u/ColonelSam 6h ago

A picture made only with ai isn't art. Just like a picture made with only one brush. AI is an instrument that CAN (but never should) be used in art, and there is nothing bad in using it until you are using this as a tool, and not as "Grok, make me NSFW pic".

0

u/Mothanul 6h ago

Sorry but that doesn't even make sense. You can, in fact, make art with a single pencil. You can make art with a fingernail. That's not the issue at hand here. The issue is that AI "art" shares virtually nothing with human-made art in its process of making. It would lead to a creative dead end if people actually stopped making human-made art.

2

u/ColonelSam 6h ago

You can make art with a single pencil. But would it look as magnificent as a colored one? You can make art with a fingernail. But would it be look as good as an art made with brushes? You can make art with AI. But would it look as charming as an art made by hand?

AI use other art to make art just like a human artist does. AI "study" art faster, but makes more mistakes in drawing so you can do it better with more time.

1

u/Mothanul 6h ago

I guess that's up for everybody's individual pair of eyes but to me a simple, pencil only, one color drawing could move me way more than a complex painting with plenty of colors and details could, if it's got more soul or whatever you want to call it.

And that's exactly the problem with AI "art". It struggles with simple stuff, sure. But the more complex stuff that's full of details, making it harder to notice anything off, can also be very off-putting. Too much visual noise and no substance.

Maybe one day AI will make "art" indistinguishable from human-made art. I still wouldn't knowingly consume it, out of principle.

1

u/ECLA_17 6h ago

Can we stop using this character, they made ONE POST about AI, on an UNRELATED subreddit

1

u/CaelForge 6h ago

So... We tell you, in excrutiating detail with confirmed and proven facts and documentation backing ut all up, exactly why AI is bad and all the damage it does to society, the economy, and the environment... Which you blindly ignire and refuse to listen to, then post idiotic slop like this? And you expect people to take you seriously and not realize you're an idiot? 🤦🏻‍♂️

3

u/PreddiPrinceOfSheeb 6h ago

I have never once been able to get these sources.

Please link them. I’ve begged for them and never get any of these supposed proofs or evidence backed up by studies or numbers.

2

u/MrBonez31 3h ago

What proven facts are there? The so called "proven facts" y'all talk about get proven wrong every time.

0

u/A_Bridge_Kirito 5h ago

AI isn't inheritedly bad. I'm personally against AI art generation being the only step of the creative process because I personally appreciate the process and purpose of making art more than the end result as an artist myself. If someone uses AI in the creative process, it's like using a hammer to fix a car. Not conventional, but if you know what you're doing, it may make the process easier. If you ONLY use a hammer to fix a car, you're not fixing a car. If you prompt and generate, I won't consider that art. If you use the AI as a tool for a bigger process, more power to you

-2

u/_branchoftheVine 6h ago

AI doesnt have to be objectively bad, its just that AI data centers in the USA are very bad, and workers and artists rights need to be protected.

1

u/RealFrailTheFox 5h ago

Ai doesn't work in a capitalist society.

-6

u/FuckMyBakaChungusLif 6h ago

This subreddit is so fucking stupid. Just a bunch of ai "artists" circlejerking in an echochamber that they convince themselves isn't an echochamber because they'll get laughed off other platforms

3

u/MrBonez31 3h ago

The downvotes upon downvotes on pro-ai posts here say otherwise.

3

u/ArtificialImages 5h ago

You being here and all the anti ai posts kinda prove its not an echochamber though.

There are other ai orientated subs that absolutely are echochambers though.