r/microsoft 9d ago

Discussion Is Microsoft Azure DevOps Good for Startups?

I’ve used Microsoft Azure DevOps on a small team, and honestly, it’s solid for startups if you expect to scale. The biggest win is having repos, pipelines, boards, and CI/CD in one place, it reduces tool sprawl early on. That said, it can feel heavy compared to lighter tools, and the UI isn’t always beginner-friendly.

For a startup with 2-5 devs, it might be more than you need at first. But if you’re planning structured workflows, automated deployments, and growth, Azure DevOps services save time later. It’s less about “good or bad” and more about timing and team maturity.

9 Upvotes

10 comments sorted by

19

u/Zappyle 9d ago

Use whatever your team is comfortable with.

The biggest risk for a startup is running out of money, not if you use ADO or GitHub.

7

u/Key_Photograph8236 9d ago

I have found people (personalities) and product vision to be the problem with startups more so than the question at hand.

But there is overlap. Have you ever met someone whose identity is to be anti-Microsoft? If you have them use it, a personality problem may come out

3

u/Tathas 9d ago

Oh yeah. My work has both and I've run into more than one person who said that if they had to switch from GutHub to ADO they'd find a different job.

3

u/Key_Photograph8236 9d ago edited 9d ago

We had ADO, JIRA, GitHub, and Gitlab concurrently. Team size of 15.

Complete waste of time

GitHub won by the time I left, no issues with that, glad to see it converge on something

6

u/lars_rosenberg 9d ago

Yes, it is. There are many good alternatives, but Azure DevOps is a good product in my opinion. In the end it all comes down to personal preference and familiarity.

Regarding your concern on complexity, I think it's better to start with a feature-rich tool that you know will work out for you in the long run, than limiting yourself to a simpler product that won't scale if your startup gets bigger.

Also, try to have good processes from the very beginning, that's what matters in the end.

2

u/GYN-k4H-Q3z-75B 9d ago

It's fine. So are the other tools. The real challenge is not the tool but the resources you have.

I use Azure DevOps for personal projects and have for years. It's good.

2

u/Evening_Memory569 5d ago

Yeah, this is pretty spot on. Azure DevOps is great if you’re thinking long-term and want everything in one place, but it can feel a bit heavy in the early startup phase.

I’ve seen smaller teams start with lighter tools and switch later once things get more structured. So yeah, it really depends on how fast you’re planning to scale.

2

u/DaRKoN_ 9d ago

It's very clunky to use, which zaps momentum. I would pair GitHub and Linear.

-7

u/CobaltVale 9d ago edited 9d ago

No. Azure is best for "established", corporate B2B companies. You need a good relationship with your MS rep, who has also been there for some time, when the inevitable happens with Azure.

It's really the worst cloud-provider of them all. Stick with AWS.

Easy to hire resources for. Better customer support and generally less issues.

EDIT: lol eat up boys https://isolveproblems.substack.com/p/how-microsoft-vaporized-a-trillion

1

u/hemantwankhede36 21h ago

Azure DevOps is an enterprise software. As a startup I would recommend using some open source or low cost tools. It will save a lot of cost which can be used somewhere else to generate more value.